Key Highlights
- 1. What’s Changing? Fixed Visa Term Instead of Duration-of-Status
- 2. Reduced Grace Period: From 60 to 30 Days
- 3. Restrictions on Program Changes and Transfers
- 4. Administrative Costs and Bureaucratic Hurdles
- 5. Oversight Push vs. Education Impacts
- 6. Broader Range of Proposed Visa Tightening
- 7. What This Means for Indian Students
- Conclusion
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is initiating far-reaching changes in the F-1 student visa system, which may disrupt the status quo in international education that has been in existence for decades. The reforms would remove the old system of status duration with a fixed-term visa, reduce the flexibility of programs and shorten the grace periods, as well as subject students and institutions to administration costs. As this regulation enters the realm of public discussion and regulation, its effects on tens of thousands of foreign students - and on American universities that rely on them - are raising increasing eyebrows.
1. What’s Changing? Fixed Visa Term Instead of Duration-of-Status
DHS will also abolish the flexible duration of status (D/S) admission policy that has enabled the F-1 visa holders to remain until the completion of their entire academic program as long as they are in good standing. Instead, admissions would have an inscribed date of termination: the completion date of a program as indicated in Form I-20 (or a four-year limit as indicated in Form DS-2019 in J-1 cases).
Any students who remained past that definite term would have to apply to have their stay extended (Form I-539) against a fee, biometrics and even interviews through the USCIS.
Also Read: US Visitor Visa B1/B2
2. Reduced Grace Period: From 60 to 30 Days
Today, F-1 students have the advantage of a 60-day remission period when it comes to the end of the program to pack up or transfer to a different school, or to seek a change of status. The new proposal would reduce this to only 30 days- equal to that of J-1 visa holders- further reducing an already narrow window on what the next step should be.
3. Restrictions on Program Changes and Transfers
With the existing policies, the flexibility of international students is high in transferring schools or switching academic goals. The suggested rule would limit such changes, particularly during the first academic year. With undergraduates, they would not be allowed to change majors, programmes or levels of studies during that same year, except in extreme cases such as the closure of schools. Graduate students can not switch programs at any stage.
In addition, after attaining a degree at one level, such a student might not be allowed back under the F-1 status to pursue the same or a lower level program. There would also be limited transfer except on exceptions by SEVP.
Also Read: Intracompany Transfer Visa USA
4. Administrative Costs and Bureaucratic Hurdles
The compliance would fall on universities- the staffing and training transfers to adopt new processes are projected to cost about US $93.3 million in the initial year. Instead, students would be required to submit new USCIS applications, including extension applications, with the following required fees, biometrics and interviews.
5. Oversight Push vs. Education Impacts
DHS positions the reform as one that will strengthen immigration control, increase program integrity, and align the F-1 and J-1 visas with other time-limited U.S. nonimmigrant programs. Nonetheless, institutions and advocacy groups warn that such changes would push away foreign students, make academic planning more difficult and divide U.S. higher education competitiveness. Both Miriam Feldblum of the Presidents Alliance and Fanta Aw of NAFSA are concerned that they may be facing drops in enrollment and international reputation.
6. Broader Range of Proposed Visa Tightening
Such F-1 visa shifts are components of a larger tightening trend that includes:
- Elimination of third-country visa interviews: Visa applicants are now required to book interviews in their native countries, and there is no longer the flexibility that they could apply in a consulate with shorter wait times.
- Increased social media background checks and interview freezes: The extra background checks, particularly on the social media accounts of applicants, and previous freezes on visa interviews have been a source of anxiety among foreign applicants.
- Enforcement and revocations of Visas: Visas have been cancelled and revoked in thousands in recent months, which has heightened the concern.
Also Read: How Many Types of Visas are in the USA? New Full Expert Guide
7. What This Means for Indian Students
The Indian students who are the largest population in the U.S. (more than 330,000) might be affected especially. Some depend on Optional Practical Training (OPT), graduate school extensions or subsequent visa programs such as H-1B. Such plans may be jeopardised by limiting the length of stay, decreasing the grace period and flexibility.
Forced to seek extensions mid-degree, deprived of time to job-hunt on OPT, or forced to scramble after finishing courses, the proposed reform may have an untenable impact on their career and education path.
Conclusion
The changes proposed by the DHS in its redesign of the F-1 visa system represent a radical departure from the long-standing, flexible, and student-friendly orientation of American international education. Hard, fixed stays, reduced flexibility in the programs and increased administrative overheads- this could be a time of uncertainty to students, universities and global competitiveness of the U.S. With the rulemaking progressing, and the public commenting, and its ultimate publication in the Federal Register, stakeholders in academia and other interested groups will follow the implication closely, and demand clarity or rebalancing.
Contact TerraTern for more information.
