Key Highlights
The family visa income rule has been riveting the United Kingdom, as the government is literally contemplating a cut in the amount of income that foreigners are required to have to be able to invite their spouses or children to the United Kingdom after being highly criticized and with a landmark assessment that was conducted by the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC). Campaigners and MPs have labelled the current threshold of 29,000 a year as a tax on love and accused it of tearing families apart and causing undesirable financial hardship to British citizens and settled residents who want to bring their foreign spouses to the UK. Should such recommendations be accepted by the MAC, then this may be a critical change in the UK immigration policy, with far-reaching individual consequences on thousands of families.
The Current Rule: What Is the Family Visa Income Requirement?
Minimum Income Requirement (MIR), referred to as the family visa income rule, requires the British citizen or settled resident to show an annual income of at least 29 000 so as to sponsor a foreign spouse or domestic partner. This threshold of which the initial value set at 18,600 in 2012 and increased to 29,000 in April 2024, is one of the highest in Europe and is designed to decrease net migration.
This rule is applicable in the majority of family visa applications, except in cases of persons who applied prior to April 2024 (who may be dealt with under the former rule (i.e. £18,600) and those who receive some disability or carer benefits8. There is an extra need for income per dependent child. The government had earlier proposed to further raise the threshold to 34,500 and then to 38,700 by the beginning of 2025 in line with the visa requirement of a skilled worker. But this had been shelved until the MAC review is completed.
Also Read: UK Plans to End ‘Failed Free Market Experiment’ in Immigration
Public Backlash: The “Tax on Love” Controversy
Massive increases in MIR have triggered fury from campaigners, families, and politicians. The critics of the rule claim that this move discriminates against British citizens with middle-level incomes, and in effect, it turns family living into a privilege of the rich. The mental health effect on the children deprived of a parent was brought to attention by the campaign group Reunite Families UK, co-founder Caroline Coombs claiming that children are the greatest losers of these rules.
The threshold was criticized by Green Party MP Carla Denyer as the cruel tax on love that tears apart families and subjects the victims with the misfortune of merely falling in love with someone who is not born in this country to untold stress2 MAC review had more than 2,000 responses which had never occurred before in its history, which showed the degree of concern among the people.
The MAC Review- Key Findings and Recommendations
The review carried out by the MAC, which was commissioned by the Home Secretary on the basis of a popular outcry, centred on the question of whether the existing level of income requirement is striking the right balance between economic interests and the right to family life. The verdict of the chairman of the committee was very obvious:
-
The given level of 29,000 is too expensive as far as most families are concerned, and it poses a risk of violating obligations with other countries, including Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, also known as ECHR, protecting the family life.
-
Family and skilled worker visas are originally rather different, so the inability to adjust the current income thresholds of the two types of visas is rather inappropriate.
-
The actual income requirement should be set to between 23000/25000 pounds, where a majority of the British full-time employees on the minimum wage would pass the threshold to bring their spouses to the UK.
-
The provision of profits abroad at the moment does not regard the earnings of the foreign partner in the UK, which is a practice that the MAC encourages the government to reform.
-
Reducing the threshold will enhance the net migration by up to 8,000 individuals per annum, which is, however, subject to weighing against the social cost of family division.
Professor Brian Bell, Chair of the MAC, acknowledged the trade-off: “There is a cost to the UK economy and UK taxpayers of having this route, and we should just be honest about that and say there is a trade-off. But people who say ‘we should set it at very high numbers to make sure that we don’t lose any money’ ignore the massive impact that has on families.”
Also Read: UK Net Migration Halves in 2024: Study and Work Visa Decline Drives Record Drop
Economic and Social Impacts
The MAC understood that a reduction in MIR may result in more net migration, but nonetheless, pointed out that the social advantages, particularly to children, are considerable despite the economic expenses. The regulation has compelled separate lives among various families and has had considerable psychological consequences on children and parents. Another thing that the committee observed is that when the foreign partner arrives in the UK/their economic inputs are not taken note of by the system at all.
What Then Occurs?
Home Office is currently considering the recommendations made by MAC and is likely to respond soon17. In the case the government agrees to the suggestions, they can reduce the income level to £ 23,000 and even up to £ 25,000, thus reuniting thousands of families in the UK. Immigration attorneys and activist groups encourage families to be informed and consult with professionals because the rules have not been implemented yet, but they may change again.
Actions Implications for the Applicants
- More families would now fit the standard five-year family route, and would be less dependent on the more complicated 10-year route or exceptional circumstances.
- Families no longer have to live together, particularly when they have to deal with children.
- Sponsors who are on low incomes or are entitled may no longer be excluded.
- Hybrid and remote teams that would receive two incomes might reach the threshold.
- Their visa procedure may be made uncomplicated and less anxious.
Also Read: UK Immigration White Paper: Reforms for Students, Workers & Caregivers
Conclusion
The family visa earners regulation of the UK is at a turning point. Although the fence was initially implemented to guard the economy and attract migration, the human cost cannot be ignored anymore. Such a suggestion by the MAC to reduce the threshold to between 23,000 and 25,000 is good news to thousands of families separated by a dysfunctional bureaucracy. The lives will not only be influenced by the decision to be made by the government in the next few weeks.
To learn more about the latest immigration news, contact TerraTern right away!
