Key Highlights
Britain is in a not-unfamiliar place, and yet the management of the much-debated national identity cards is. With the country under pressure of increasing immigration, a very unstable world where things seem to be getting crazier with each passing day, and a public service system stretched to every limit, the issue of the introduction of ID cards is no longer a marginal topic of discussion but a viable policy proposal. As the various rallying cries of civil liberties and unreasonable expenditure pop up again, those in favour claim that it is now time that Britain caught up with the likes of other advanced countries, which have not only accepted but also begun to use the universal mechanism of identification as a fundamental tool in their statehood.
The concept of national ID cards is not something novel in British politics at all. The idea was vehemently opposed ever since John Major failed to make a successful voluntary scheme work in the mid-1990s and Tony Blair made much more ambitious (but in the end repealed) legislation in the 2000s. The new wave of this debate is something different, though. Led by such high-profile voices as those of the Labour Together think tank associated with Keir Starmer, as well as by more established politicians such as Blair and William Hague, there is now a notable groundswell to implement them. It is an additional indicator of a realisation that not only is the distinctive British policy on identification, what is called a no-umbrella policy, possibly no longer viable in a turbulent world.
Also Read: UK Tourist Visa Latest Guide | Apply Now with TerraTern
A Shifting Landscape: Why Now?
The libertarian objections to the ID cards, which are frequently built around the change of nature of the relationship between the state and the citizen and the incompatibility with the traditions of the common law, are quite certainly powerful. But in the modern world, everything has changed radically. Objections to government-required personal data harvesting based on privacy concerns are arguably less convincing in the face of the ubiquitous practice of the (private) sector indulging in it, including their analysis of online shopping habits or their social media interactions. Moreover, these numbers, together with the liquidity of international movement to and out of Britain, have radically changed the practical background of this discussion. With a proportion of the UK being born outside the country at 16 per cent and human smuggling being a worldwide trade, the unimaginable idea of ID cards seems to become the business as usual and, in fact, a must.
The Immigration Imperative: Closing the Gaps
The best case that can now be made for ID cards concerns the rising immigration crisis. This is because in the absence of a universal identification system, the major line of defence that Britain has against illegal immigration is at its borders. The ID card system, on the other hand, would include several points where one would be checking identity, thus a more solid and vigorous system of defence.
The best case that can now be made for ID cards concerns the rising immigration crisis. This is because, in the absence of a universal identification system, the major line of defence that Britain has against illegal immigration is at its borders. The ID card system, on the other hand, would include several points where one would be checking identity, thus a more solid and vigorous system of defence.
Besides instant border control, a universal system of IDs is very important to the state in its attempt to get to know its people and in its equal handling of said people. In many ways, the state in Britain is blind to the people living on its territory; there are even estimations according to which a million more people live than stated in the official census. This inaccuracy in demographic data obstructs long-range infrastructure development and crime prevention as well as resource allocation by government agencies.
Also Read: UK Visitor Visa: Complete Application and Guidelines
Beyond Immigration: National Preparedness and Citizen Protection
The case of ID cards cannot be limited to immigration reasons. Britain has played with ID cards in the past in times of war, first using them as an instrument of military recruitment in World War I, then as a means of rationing and anti-espionage in World War II. A national ID system may be considered as an important aspect of overall national readiness in a world that is deemed to be even more dangerous than the times of the 1930s, where even some countries are beginning to resort to the use of conscription once again. This is in line with a wider requirement that the state should understand its population better to achieve national security and resilience.
Moreover, ID cards might generate notable bottom-up advantages to the citizens. The Windrush scandal, in which lawful West Indian immigrants who could not prove their residency status were deported, despite seemingly having strong supporting documentation, is a harsh lesson both in the instability of a lack of well-established, universal forms of identity-proving mechanisms and in the fragility of the legal status of people who cannot prove their identity. Although the authenticity of proofs issued by various private agencies is already considered by citizens as the best recourse in most cases, an official form of identity like a government-endorsed ID would serve as a conclusive and official inquiry facility on identity verification that would ensure that no one would be trapped in similar bureaucratic hobgoblins again.
Also Read: UK Immigration: All You Need to Know
The Cost and the Concession
There is no doubt that the proposed national ID card system would have a huge cost attached to it. The previous bid by Blair was estimated to be 5 billion pounds (6.7 billion dollars), but on independent calculations, it was even more. This significant investment is a major point of contention and something that any new proposal would have to overcome. In addition, by introducing ID cards, it would only be natural to transfer authorities to the government at the expense of the individual citizen, which strikes a chord with those citizens who are more focused on the right to personal freedoms.
Conclusion: The Unfolding Necessity
The legitimate arguments about expense and personal freedoms notwithstanding, recent events, a combination of the soaring tide of immigration issues, growing international unrest, and the real-world needs of living in an age of mobility, make a strong case for national ID cards. According to the article's beautiful words, the weather is now too stormy to support the policy of no umbrellas in Britain anymore. It is no longer a question of whether ID cards are wanted, but rather whether they have become an inevitable necessity for a country that truly feels the need to manage its borders, provide security to its people, and plan its way into the future properly.
To stay updated about the latest immigration news, contact TerraTern right away!
